Regulatory Rumblings

Digital Advertising Alliance Releases Guidelines for Expansion of Self-Regulatory Principles to Mobile Media

Posted: Jul 24, 2013 12:00pm ET

The Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA), of which ANA is a founding member, released guidelines today for expanding its self-regulatory program of consumer choice to the mobile environment. These guidelines cover cross-app, personal directory, and precise location data in mobile apps.

The release of these mobile guidelines is critically important given the explosion of the mobile environment as a major point of contact with consumers and the enormous number of activities that are now carried out with the use of mobile devices. These guidelines demonstrate that the DAA is the real mechanism for true consumer choice in the online world.

ANA President and CEO Bob Liodice said, “The DAA program is not only global, but now also mobile. The expansion of the DAA program into the mobile realm is an extraordinarily important development. Mobile is, by far, the fastest growing media category. Half of all U.S. adults now have a connection to the web through either a smartphone or tablet, so it’s all the more critical that they have control over how they receive advertising on their mobile devices. The DAA mobile guidelines give them that control.”

The full press release can be found here. For more information about the DAA program, visit http://www.aboutads.info.

Pressure Continues on Food Companies – At Home and Abroad

Posted: Jul 17, 2013 2:00pm ET

Last week, the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Financial Services and General Government renewed a provision in the appropriations bill barring the FTC from releasing a final Interagency Working Group (IWG) Report until a cost-benefit analysis is performed. But recent developments have not all been good news for food advertisers. Domestically, obesity was officially named a disease by the American Medical Association in June, which will certainly change the way that the medical community and policy makers view the obesity epidemic in the U.S.

Internationally, things have been heating up as well. Just recently, a new law has come into effect in Chile that places significant restrictions on the advertisement of foods considered high in calories, fat, salt, or sugar content. Under this law, foods in these categories must be labeled as such, and such products may not be sold in primary or secondary schools in Chile. There is an absolute prohibition on advertisements of these products targeted to children under the age of 14, and any use of so-called toys or prizes in connection with the sale of such products is banned. The Health Ministry of Chile must issue guidelines to determine which products qualify to be covered by the law before the law can be fully enforced.

In June, WHO Europe issued a report recommending increased restrictions on the marketing of foods high in fat, salt, and sugar (“HFSS”) to children. This report stated that a majority of advertisements in Europe are for HFSS foods and said there is a direct link between food advertising and obesity. WHO Europe also called industry efforts insufficient.

And the National Assembly of Ecuador recently passed a law with significant restrictions on all advertisements, including those for food products. Under the Ecuadorian law, all foreign ads (those for companies without a majority of the stockholders being Ecuadorian nationals or legal residents and those ads which do not have 80 percent or more of those contributing to the ad being Ecuadorian nationals or legal residents) will be banned. Any advertisement, including food advertisements, that will be shown during children’s programming must be approved by the country’s Health Ministry. The law also states that ads for any products whose regular use may “harm” the health of consumers (including alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and potentially some foods) are prohibited.

Also in June, back home at the federal level, Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Richard Durbin (D-IL), and Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) sent a letter to Nickelodeon and Viacom urging them to ban advertisements for “unhealthy food” on the network. And in a separate press release about the letter, Senator Rockefeller called for the elimination of the advertising tax deduction for marketing of such foods.

Nevertheless, the food and beverage industry has a very positive story to tell. The industry has been proactive through its self-regulatory efforts, such as the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation and Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), in cutting more than a trillion five hundred million calories out of foods in just the last couple of years and in shifting the mix of food advertising directed to children 12 and under to healthier foods. As successful as these efforts have been, the pressure on governments to “do something” in response to the obesity problem will only continue to grow. It is our responsibility to help educate policymakers that we are working diligently to be part of the solution.

Ad Tax Storm Clouds on the Horizon Again

Posted: Jun 28, 2013 2:00pm ET

As long expected, it appears the Senate Finance Committee is ramping up efforts on tax reform. On Thursday, Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT) of the Senate Finance Committee have released a “Dear Colleague” letter, asking for proposals for tax reform. Their letter states that they will start with a “blank slate,” and so-called “special provisions” will be assumed eliminated, unless it is shown that those provisions: “1) help grow the economy, 2) make the tax code fairer, or 3) effectively promote other important policy objectives.”

They ask for legislative language describing expenditures that meet these tests, as well as other provisions that should be added or repealed in an ultimate tax reform bill. The Senators also make clear in their letter that every expenditure added back to their “blank slate” will reduce the amount by which corporate and individual income tax rates could ultimately be lowered. They state that they will give extra attention to any proposals that are bipartisan in nature.

Advertising expenditures, which are fully deductible as a necessary and ordinary business expense in the year they are made, clearly meet these tests and should be kept. A study by IHS Global Insight in 2010, developed by Nobel Laureate in Economics Lawrence Klein, demonstrates that advertising is responsible for $4.1 trillion in economic output and directly supports more than 15 million jobs in the United States annually. In a time of recovery from an economic downturn, advertising clearly provides a powerful engine of economic growth.

The taxation of advertising is counterproductive when trying to generate economic activity and jobs. It would be totally counterproductive to impose extra costs and burdens on advertising. Such a step would only serve to weaken economic growth, and ultimately, tax revenue.

Now begins a period of great challenge. In a time when everyone will be jockeying to be the expenditure or deduction that is not targeted, advertisers must be ready and willing to show why ad deductibility needs to be supported rather than undermined.


Advertising Industry Addresses Childhood Obesity Challenge

Posted: Jun 24, 2013 10:30am ET

Last week, the World Health Organization’s Europe office called for tighter controls on the marketing of food to children in order to fight childhood obesity.  At the same time, the American Medical Association officially recognized obesity as a disease while a few U.S. Senators are pressuring Viacom to follow Disney’s lead to no longer accept advertisements for unhealthy foods. As momentum continues to regulate advertising directed towards children, the advertising community, which firmly believes that childhood obesity is a serious national challenge, has taken proactive measures to address this epidemic and encourage children to lead healthy and active lifestyles.

In 2009, the industry came together to form the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation, a CEO-led coalition designed to help reduce obesity – especially childhood obesity – by 2015. The coalition, which includes more than 230 retailers, food and beverage companies, restaurants, sporting goods companies, professional sports organizations and others, made a pledge in 2010 that its member companies will collectively cut 1.5 trillion calories from their products by the end of 2015.

This initiative has been extremely successful. In March of this year, the Foundation announced that it had exceeded the goal of reducing 1.5 trillion calories in the U.S. marketplace two years ahead of schedule. Companies met this goal by offering low calorie options of products, changing product recipes to allow for lower calorie counts, and reducing portion sizes of single-serve products.

The Foundation has also been working alongside First Lady Michelle Obama on her “Let’s Move” Initiative. The Ad Council was chosen by First Lady Michelle Obama to produce a series of public service ads to promote the initiative. According to studies conducted by The Ad Council, with the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the campaigns are having a significant impact on attitudes and behaviors. Significant numbers of respondents report that their eating habits and activity levels are much healthier.  Media companies, including broadcast, cable, online, print and outdoor, have donated millions of dollars in public service advertising time and space to this effort.

Proactively, the advertising industry also created a self-governing program, the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI).  The voluntary commitment of the 17 member companies – companies that carry out more than 80 percent of all food, beverage, and restaurant advertisements directed to children under the age of 12 in the United States – has significantly changed the landscape of children’s advertising. Major quick service restaurants now advertise kids’ meals with apple products and low fat milk. Other participating food manufacturers have significantly lowered sodium or sugar content of the products they advertise to children and some major confectionary and soft drink manufacturers have voluntarily committed not to advertise on child-directed media.

The CFBAI reports that over 80 percent of its members’ products now being advertised on child-directed media are a good source of nutrients that children do not get enough of in their diets, including calcium and fiber. As of 2010, all participating companies are required to direct advertising toward children under the age of 12 to products that are healthier. These significant and voluntary efforts undertaken to improve the food advertised to children have been a major step forward in the fight against childhood obesity.

The advertising industry has made tremendous strides to voluntarily address childhood obesity – through its support of the Let’s Move effort, participation in the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation, and voluntary efforts limiting the types of ads that appear on children’s programming. As public officials and medical professionals continue to tackle childhood obesity, so too will the advertising industry, as it continues to play a major role in helping people to lead healthier and more active lives.

FTC Commissioner Ohlhausen Applauds Industry’s Successful Self-Regulation Privacy Program

Posted: Jun 11, 2013 10:45am ET

Last week, technology and policy leaders from across the country gathered in Washington for a Summit to discuss the role of effective self-regulation in ensuring the future of advertising-supported Internet content. Convened by the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA), of which the ANA is a member, the Summit largely focused on enhancing transparency and ensuring that consumers are aware of the choices they have with respect to the manner in which they receive advertising.

During the Summit, the industry’s efforts were recognized by U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen, who applauded the industry for its privacy opt-out program, which she said has “been one of the success stories in the space.”

She noted that the industry has moved quickly to meet privacy challenges and alleviate the concerns of Internet users who have become increasingly concerned about their online privacy. Ohlhausen called the Advertising Option Icon, the icon that consumers can click to easily find information about interest-based advertising, “an innovative way to reach consumers about their privacy options.”

In her remarks, she said that self-regulation works best when it is supported by compliance and tough enforcement and recognized DAA for “making enforceability a reality.” She was encouraged by DAA’s work to ensure that “companies live up to the promises they make” and help correct issues before they become serious problems for consumers. Already the enforcement arm of the DAA self-regulatory program has successfully finalized 19 cases.

Ohlhausen further remarked that she does not see a present need for Congress to pass new laws to protect consumer’s Internet privacy. She stated that she believed the FTC’s Section 5 false, deceptive, and unfair acts or practices authority was sufficient to regulate the marketplace. It is clear that DAA’s self-regulatory program that provides consumers with broad choice and control over how and whether they receive interest-based advertising is working.

The industry is constantly striving to adapt and keep up with the fast moving technology landscape. To that end, DAA will soon release guidelines for the use of advertising on mobile devices, another area of broad discussion at the Summit. These new guidelines will no doubt be a game changer for the industry and mobile users alike.

Finally, there were important panels at the DAA Summit on the key role Online Behavioral Advertising was playing in helping to create a more efficient, effective, and relevant Internet. Additionally, a panel on Internet self-regulatory efforts described how the DAA program has now been established in almost 30 countries. Clearly, the DAA has had an extraordinary reach in its less than 3 year existence.

ICANN Fails to Address Key Concerns About New Top Level Domain Names

Posted: May 16, 2013 1:35pm ET

ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) in late April announced that it would push back the date of the rollout of as many as 1,400 new Top Level Domain (gTLD) web site suffixes. It did so to address the numerous concerns raised by many organizations, including law enforcement agencies and its own Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), which have called attention to the significant threat these new general top level domain names (TLDs) could pose to brands and consumer protections without adequate protective mechanisms being put in place. Unfortunately, ICANN continues to fall short of truly addressing these concerns as the new web site suffixes have now precipitously been rescheduled to roll out in June and to begin to be put into the root system of the Internet beginning in August.

The Association of National Advertisers (ANA), representing the interests of major global advertisers, along with major companies like Verisign and PayPal, has long expressed concerns about the rush to deploy these gTLDs before ICANN has adopted sufficient trademark and security and stability protections for consumers and brandholders.

This week, ANA filed comments with ICANN to its proposed Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAA). ANA recommends that in order to ensure that ICANN can manage registrations for TLDs effectively, the organization must finalize the accreditation agreements with registrars that will manage the domain names before any new gTLD contracts are approved and hold these registrars responsible for applicants complying with the RAA. In addition, we remain very concerned that ICANN’s compliance department still hasn’t been augmented sufficiently or that fully automated systems have been put in place to meet the expected increased compliance demands creating serious potential gaps in enforcement. 

ICANN’s premature launch of gTLDs will also increase the threat of cybersquatting and phishing, among many other potential cybercrime threats that jeopardize brand and consumer protections.  The law enforcement community has made several important recommendations to ICANN, including more robust verification of WHOIS information. These are highly valid concerns and it would be seriously premature for ICANN to rush ahead before fully heeding these warnings from law enforcement.

ANA also filed comments this week regarding the GAC advice given to ICANN in the Communiqué delivered at ICANN’s Beijing meeting last month.  ANA called on ICANN in particular to reconsider its earlier decision that allows for the singular and plural forms of suffixes (e.g., “.coupon” and “.coupons,” and “.auto” and “autos.”), which ICANN so far seems to believe will somehow not confuse consumers. It is unquestionable that consumers will find it difficult to identify the difference between these website when they are searching for suffixes that are practically identical. These virtually identical suffixes could lead enterprising applicants to apply for the plural (or singular) forms of popular TLDs intending to mislead or otherwise harm consumers.

In addition, ICANN continues to adhere to an overly aggressive timetable with regard to the public comment period regarding the GAC Advice and thereby has not provided adequate time to satisfactorily respond to all the important public interest issues raised.  Furthermore, we believe that the concerns raised by Verisign and PayPal about the potential clash between internal and external TLDs are profoundly serious and must be satisfactorily addressed before the roll out, if we do not want to create major increased cybercrime threats to the Internet.  

It is clear that ICANN has not taken the necessary steps to protect Internet users. The Internet is too valuable and important to consumers, brandholders and the global economy for ICANN not to address the issues raised. ANA urges ICANN to extend the time to truly consider these concerns before rolling out these TLDs that could permanently change the face of the Internet.

ANA Files Comments on ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Communiqué

Posted: May 14, 2013 4:00pm ET

Today, ANA filed detailed comments on the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Communiqué, supporting most of its proposals. ANA particularly noted that ICANN should reconsider its earlier decisions in regard to singular and plural forms of generic Top Level Domain strings (e.g. .COUPON and .COUPONS). ANA pointed out that ICANN's timetable to consider the comments in regard to the GAC Advice was overly aggressive and fails to provide adequate time to satisfactorily respond to the public interest issues that have been raised.

ANA Files Comments on ICANN’s Proposed New Registrar Accreditation Agreements

Posted: May 13, 2013 4:50pm ET

ANA has filed comments with ICANN in regard to its proposed new Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAA). The RAA is the agreement that ICANN has with operators of Top Level Domains. In particular, we pointed out that a strong compliance process must be an integral part of the new RAA program for these changes to provide effective protection on the Internet. The comments can be found here.

The Tax Fight Is Not Over

Posted: Apr 12, 2013 10:55am ET

In recent weeks, advertisers have seen some important positive developments in regard to state ad tax proposals. A number of major state tax reform proposals that imposed major burdens on advertisers have been revamped or scrapped. In early March, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton announced that he was backing off from his plan to expand the state sales tax to most business services. A sales tax on advertising had been included in his original proposal.

Earlier this week, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (who had proposed eliminating the state income tax, raising the sales tax, and expanding the sales tax to a number of services including ad agency services) said he would defer tax reform initiatives to the state legislature rather than pushing his own proposal. Jindal’s proposals had been receiving significant political flack and criticism before he backed away. And on Tuesday, the Ohio House of Representatives stripped Governor John Kasich’s plan to expand the state’s sales tax to cover almost all business services, including advertising, out of its budget bill.

The threat, however, is far from over. Governor Jindal has told the state legislature that he expects a tax proposal to phase out the state income tax. Should the legislature accept this challenge, inevitably they will have to look elsewhere to fill the revenue gap. Advertisers, therefore, could still find themselves in the line of fire. Also, in Ohio, the Senate has not yet come forward with a plan.

And then there is the Congress. The House Ways and Means Committee (the House tax writing committee) has divided its membership into eleven working groups, which have been tasked with reviewing current tax laws. On Monday, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) co-authored an article in the Wall Street Journal saying that tax reform was “alive and doable” and said they would look to close “tax loopholes.”

The real crunch will come when the Congress tries to determine what qualifies as a “loophole.” We have heard from various sources on the Hill that “everyone will have to be ready to give something.” In the past, too often we have seen advertising looked to as a potential source for new revenue. These tax proposals have been targeted at both specific so-called “controversial categories,” as well as on an across-the-board basis.

To respond, we have been proactively meeting broadly with Hill leadership. In doing so, we are relying on a major study carried out by the noted economic research group IHS Global Insight. That study demonstrates that advertising is responsible for $4.1 trillion in economic output and directly supports more than 15 million jobs in the United States annually.

Advertising, throughout the existence of the U.S. income tax code, always has been treated as an ordinary and necessary business expense. It has never been treated as an exception to or a special provision of the tax code. When business is still struggling to bounce back from the long economic downturn, now is certainly not the time to place additional tax burdens on advertising, one of the major economic engines of our economy!

Train Wreck Ahead: National Advertisers, PayPal, and Verisign Point to Major Internet Dangers

Posted: Apr 2, 2013 1:40pm ET

The start of the new month marks the final countdown to the impending deployment of potentially more than 1,400 new web site suffixes, which according to Verisign, PayPal, and other major companies poses significant threats to brands and consumer protections. On April 23, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) will launch new generic top level domain names (gTLDs). This date was set totally arbitrarily by Fadi Chehadé, the CEO of ICANN, and it is now apparent that preparations for this deployment are woefully inadequate.

Verisign (the largest domain provider, which stands to benefit financially from the gTLD deployment) and PayPal (the leading global online payment processor that is continually subject to Internet fraud issues) are the latest major companies to warn that extremely serious Internet security and stability issues will be significantly heightened with the introduction of the new web domains. (See: Verisign white paper and PayPal Letter).

The Association of National Advertisers (ANA), representing the interests of major global advertisers, has long expressed its concerns about the rush to deploy these gTLDs before ICANN has adopted sufficient protections for consumers and brandholders.

One of the greatest concerns is ICANN’s failure to release specifications regarding its Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH).  Verisign stated, for example,  that the “absence of any clear commitment for when the specifications and the TMCH will be available for integration testing and when it will be live precludes organizations from proceeding with planning, scheduling, development and normal business planning and associated communications with customers." Without this information, organizations are unable to integrate their operations with ICANN’s system, and their millions of customers are the ones who will face harm.  In another area, internal company intranet certifications have been issued for .corp, .mail, and other domains, which are expected to mirror the names of many new TLDs.  VeriSign and PayPal have identified that name clashes could occur between external new gTLD name requests and existing internal company operations.   Clearly, the implications would be very serious if hackers tried to interrupt corporate communications from companies that serve critical functions (such as defense contractors, financial services, and public utilities).  

Nevertheless, ICANN moves relentlessly forward toward the April 23rd launch date, while ignoring the concerns voiced by those within and outside ICANN’s own operations.  To date, Fadi Chehadé continues to publicly dismiss concerns raised by industry experts. He has suggested that these concerns have been “discussed at length.”  But that’s like the Captain of the Titanic before the crash saying that the dangers of icebergs had been discussed for years.  Until clear answers are forthcoming that detail how ICANN intends to avoid the dangers spotlighted in these reports, launching the program would be ill-advised, and even reckless. Ultimately, ICANN’s premature launch of gTLDs will yield cybersquatting and phishing, among many other cybercrime threats that jeopardize brand and consumer protections. Adequate steps have not been taken to protect Internet users, and we are headed toward uncharted waters with major danger to consumers, brandholders, and the Internet itself.  The only prudent action for ICANN now is to delay this arbitrary domain name roll-out until it has fixed these very serious problems.

<< 1234567 >>

About This Blog

Focuses on all federal and state government and legal initiatives that threaten national advertisers' freedom of commercial speech. The blog is penned by Dan Jaffe, the ANA's Group Executive Vice President, Government Relations, who also heads the trade association's Washington office.