| |

ANA Urges FCC to Reject Onerous New Rules for Product Placement

ANA and other industry groups have urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reject proposals for onerous new time restrictions or disclosure rules on product placement in television programming.  We believe that the current disclosure rules of the FCC are fully adequate to inform the public about various forms of sponsorship practices.

Earlier this year, the FCC published a Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOI/NPRM) on product placement.  The Commission sought comment on a proposed rule change that would require disclosures to have lettering of a specific size and to air for a particular amount of time during a program.  In September, ANA and a large, diverse group of media and marketing companies and associations filed comments urging the Commission to reject any new disclosure rules as unnecessary and overly restrictive.

The FCC received comments from a broad range of groups and individuals.  Three groups that are strongly critical of product placement filed comments urging the Commission to go even further than the NOI/NPRM:

ANA and other industry groups felt it was critical to respond to these proposals, so we filed reply comments last Friday.  Both sets of comments were drafted by Robert Corn-Revere, a media/First Amendment expert and partner at the law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP.  ANA was a leader in building the coalition of groups that came together to protect product placement on television programming.

The extreme proposals from these three groups would regulate product placement as if the television audience is made up entirely of children.  Our comments argue that the FCC has no statutory authority to impose time-restrictions on product placement.  Also, we noted that any effort by the Commission to regulate TV programming content by imposing time-channeling rules would raise very serious First Amendment concerns.

There has been no showing of how the public is "harmed" in any way by product placement.  The FCC's proposal appears to be a solution in search of a problem.  We believe these proposals are clearly unnecessary and because they are overly restrictive, would violate the First Amendment.  We urged the FCC to terminate this proceeding and simply clarify how existing FCC rules and policies apply to product placement. 

Legislative and Regulatory Issues Tracking

ANA's Washington, DC office works to protect the ability of all marketers to communicate effectively with consumers.   The scope of legislation, regulations, and court cases impacting the marketing community continues to be extremely broad, extending to issues as diverse as online privacy, prescription drug advertising, restrictions on the tax deductibility of advertising costs and the regulatory powers of the Federal Trade Commission.

Read more >

Compendium of Legislative, Regulatory and Legal Issues

ANA's Washington, DC office plays a leading role in protecting the ability of all marketers to communicate effectively with consumers. At the end of each year, we prepare a Compendium which describes our efforts on the broad range of issues we have faced. 

Read more >

Alliance for Family Entertainment

The ANA Alliance for Family Entertainment (AFE) is a coalition of national advertisers, supported by the ANA, which represents almost 40% of all U.S. television advertising dollars..

Learn more >


ANA and the American Association of Advertising Agencies (4A’s) conduct broadcast talent negotiations with the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA) through the Joint Policy Committee, or JPC.

Learn more >