Advertising Financial Management Committee

The Advertising Financial Management Committee strives to bring better value to members' organizations by discussing such important topics as process efficiencies, cost savings, and return on investment. Participants on this committee have varied job responsibilities including financial managers, marketing procurement and sourcing professionals, and members within general marketing and advertising management.

This committee helps program the ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference, which will next be hosted in Orlando, Fla. May 5 – 8, 2024.

• Co-Chair: Katherine Freeley, Global Head of Media & Digital, Procurement, Novartis
• Co-Chair: Sherry Ulsh, Director, Indirect Procurement, The Hershey Company

Contact the ANA staff managing the Advertising Financial Management Committee:

• Greg Wright, Senior Vice President
• Peter Kenigsberg, Director

Discussion Topics:

The Advertising Financial Management Committee is open to all client-side marketer members.

Request to Join

Resources

• Supplier Diversity Resources
• Presentations and recaps from the 2023 ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference
• Finance and procurement content in the ANA Marketing Knowledge Center
• The Agency Search and Selection Playbook
• Resources for Media Agency Contract Compliance, Media Auditing and Related Services
• Agency Compensation Methods: An ANA Guidebook

Thought Leadership

• ANA/4A's Cost of the Pitch (July 2023)
  Historically, it has been understood that agencies devote significant resources to the defense of an existing account when put into review and to the pursuit of new business. Until now, however, there has been little if any data on the cost of any agency review to the client. The findings from this research identified a significant cost to the client when they run a review, as it is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process. The cost implications, potential for disruptions in daily work, and delays in campaign and product launches, as well as the evident impact on partner relationships, should not be taken lightly.
• Trends in Agency Compensation, 18th Edition (November 2022)
  For more than 50 years, the ANA has fielded this unique and comprehensive agency compensation survey among client-side marketer members. According to the results of the 2022 ANA Trends in Agency Compensation survey, fees, particularly labor-based fees, are the most dominant method of compensation. Fees are becoming so prevalent that they are, in fact, increasing in popularity over newer methods of compensation, such as value-based compensation and sales commission-based methodologies. The report also revealed that the use of performance incentives as a complement to fees are being increasingly questioned with most respondents stating that they "don't know" whether performance compensation is improving their agency's performance.
• ANA/4A’s Agency Search Simplification Report (September 2022)
  The agency search/pitch process has become fraught with concerns by both agencies and clients. Both sides recognize the complexity of the process yet aspire for an opportunity to reach a mutually agreeable solution. The ANA and the 4A’s surveyed their respective members to understand the various pain points in the agency search process, as well as their value (or lack thereof) to the overall process. This report contains results of that survey, as well as key findings, conclusions, and next steps.
• Guidelines to Help Buyers and Diverse Media Suppliers Work Better Together
  There are two complementary sets of guidelines:
  • For Buyers (Agencies and Marketers) When Doing Business with Diverse Media Suppliers (May 2022)
  • For Diverse Media Suppliers When Doing Business with Buyers (Agencies and Marketers) (August 2022)
• Procurement 2022: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (August 2022)
  The relationship between marketing procurement and marketing has shown some modest improvement while the relationship between procurement and agencies has not. The report concludes with ten specific recommendations to improve the relationships between procurement and marketing and procurement and agencies.
• Certified Diverse Suppliers Resource List (July 2022)
  Finding diverse suppliers is a key challenge in supplier diversity. As a follow-up to the 2020 report, “The Power of Supplier Diversity,” ANA/AIMM began curating a list of diverse suppliers that work in our industry. The initial “Certified Diverse Suppliers Resource List” was issued in July 2020 and has been updated on a regular basis. The last 2021 update, published in December, listed 377 companies. The list more than doubled in 2021, increasing from 186 companies a year earlier.
• And Now a Word from the Diverse Suppliers: The Supplier Perspective on Certification (December 2021)
  This research surveyed suppliers on the ANA/AIMM list of certified diverse suppliers. The focus was on certification, to understand its importance, benefits, challenges, ease/difficulty of the process, and more. The research found that there are multiple benefits of obtaining certification. Businesses are included in more RFPs, which provides additional exposure to corporate marketing departments, which leads to increased sales.
• The Business Case for Relationship Management (October 2020)
  A strong client/agency relationship management program with at least an annual 360º evaluation component is key to ensuring a long-term client/agency relationship that is built on trust. This report from the 4A’s and ANA covers the findings from quantitative and qualitative research conducted to measure the current state of affairs related to relationship management program adoption levels, overall satisfaction, and benefits derived from their use.
• The Power of Supplier Diversity (May 2020)
  A supplier diversity program is a proactive business program which encourages the use of women-owned, ethnic/minority-owned, veteran-owned, LGBTQ-owned, disability-owned, and small businesses as suppliers. This report covers the findings from quantitative and qualitative research conducted by the ANA. The purpose was to gain an understanding of the incidence of supplier diversity programs as well as benefits, challenges, spend, goals, measurement, influence, and more.
• Payment Terms: Current Practices for Marketing Services (March 2020)
  Given member interest resulting from coverage in the advertising/marketing trade press regarding changes in payment terms being implemented by a handful of companies to some suppliers, ANA initiated research to determine if such changes were isolated examples or reflective of a broader trend. The answer is clear: payment term changes, notably extended terms, are reflective of a broader trend. The services noted most for extended payment terms are agency fees, research, and production. The majority of respondents who have extended their payment terms have done so to derive better cash flow.